Skip to content
info@painworx.co.uk
PAINWORX UK

Evidence Based Practice

    PAINWORX UK

    Evidence Based Practice

    • Diagnosis & Management
      • Case History
        • Case History
        • Red flags
        • Yellow flags
        • Questionnaires
      • Physical Exam
        • Physical Exam
        • Orthopedic Tests
        • Cranial nerve testing
        • DMR’S upper limb
        • DMR’S lower limb
        • Special Investigations
      • Treatment & Rehabilitation
    • Informative Articles
    • View our CPD courses
      • Advanced Myofascial Release Techniques
    • Legal
      • About Us
      • Our Disclaimer
      • Privacy Policy
      • CPD Legal Documents
    • Search for:

    1. Home  - Uncategorized  - 
    15Oct, 2024
    Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
    The Effectiveness of Conventional Prescribed Drugs by GPs vs. Manual Therapy for Sciatica

    Sciatica is a common condition characterized by pain radiating from the lower back down the leg, typically caused by compression or irritation of the sciatic nerve. Treatment options for sciatica include pharmacological interventions prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) and non-pharmacological methods such as manual therapy. This article will compare the effectiveness of these two approaches, drawing on evidence from peer-reviewed research.

    Pharmacological Management of Sciatica

    General practitioners commonly prescribe non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, and muscle relaxants for sciatica. NSAIDs like ibuprofen and diclofenac are often used to reduce inflammation and provide symptomatic relief (Friedman et al., 2015). These medications have shown moderate effectiveness in relieving pain in the short term. A systematic review by Roelofs et al. (2008) found that NSAIDs provided modest relief for acute sciatica, but the benefit was often transient, and long-term outcomes were less favorable.

    Opioids are another class of drugs prescribed for sciatica, though they are typically reserved for severe cases due to the risk of dependency and side effects. According to a study by Deyo et al. (2015), opioid prescriptions for sciatica offer little additional benefit compared to NSAIDs, and their potential for misuse presents a significant concern. Similarly, muscle relaxants like diazepam and cyclobenzaprine are frequently prescribed, but their efficacy is mixed. A study by van Tulder et al. (2000) noted that muscle relaxants can provide short-term pain relief but are not effective in improving functional outcomes.

    Corticosteroids, often delivered via epidural injection, are another treatment option. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) by Arden et al. (2005) demonstrated that corticosteroid injections could provide short-term relief for sciatica, but the long-term benefits were minimal. In addition, there is growing concern over the potential side effects, such as increased risk of infection and osteoporosis.

    Limitations of Pharmacological Interventions

    Despite the widespread use of these drugs, their effectiveness remains controversial. A Cochrane review (Lewis et al., 2015) concluded that while pharmacological treatments may offer short-term relief, they do not improve long-term outcomes in patients with sciatica. Furthermore, adverse effects like gastrointestinal issues from NSAIDs and dependency risks from opioids are significant concerns in long-term treatment (Friedman et al., 2015).

    Manual Therapy for Sciatica

    Manual therapy, including spinal manipulation, mobilization, and massage, is a popular non-pharmacological treatment for sciatica, especially among chiropractic and physiotherapy practitioners. A growing body of evidence suggests that manual therapy can be an effective treatment option, particularly for patients who prefer to avoid medication or are unresponsive to drugs.

    Spinal Manipulation and Mobilization

    Spinal manipulation is often used in chiropractic care and involves applying controlled force to the joints of the spine. Research shows promising results for spinal manipulation in treating sciatica. A study by Leininger et al. (2011) found that spinal manipulation provided significant pain relief in patients with acute sciatica compared to standard medical care. Similarly, an RCT by McMorland et al. (2010) found that patients who received chiropractic manipulation reported less pain and improved function compared to those who underwent surgery.

    Mobilization techniques, which involve passive movement of joints and soft tissues, have also demonstrated efficacy in treating sciatica. In a study by Cleland et al. (2009), patients who received mobilization techniques showed greater improvement in pain and disability compared to those receiving standard care. These findings suggest that mobilization can be particularly effective when combined with exercise therapy.

    Massage and Soft Tissue Therapy

    Massage therapy, including deep tissue and myofascial release techniques, is another form of manual therapy frequently used for sciatica. A systematic review by Furlan et al. (2015) reported that massage therapy could reduce pain and improve function in patients with chronic low back pain and sciatica. The study concluded that massage could be an effective adjunct to other treatments, such as exercise therapy and spinal manipulation.

    However, it is important to note that manual therapy is not without limitations. The efficacy of these treatments often depends on the skill and experience of the practitioner, and results can vary between individuals. Additionally, while manual therapy can offer significant relief, it may need to be combined with exercise and lifestyle changes to achieve long-term improvement (Mannion et al., 2012).

    Comparative Effectiveness: Pharmacological vs. Manual Therapy

    When comparing the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions and manual therapy for sciatica, manual therapy appears to offer greater benefits, particularly in terms of long-term outcomes. While drugs like NSAIDs and opioids may provide quick, short-term pain relief, they do not address the underlying mechanical causes of sciatica. In contrast, manual therapy aims to restore normal joint function and relieve nerve compression, potentially providing more sustainable relief (Leininger et al., 2011).

    Moreover, manual therapy generally has fewer adverse effects than pharmacological treatments. While drugs can cause gastrointestinal distress, dependency, or other complications, manual therapy is considered safe with a low risk of serious side effects (Furlan et al., 2015). However, the choice of treatment should ultimately be based on patient preferences, the severity of symptoms, and the individual’s response to initial treatment.

    Conclusion

    Both pharmacological interventions and manual therapy have their place in the treatment of sciatica. However, manual therapy, particularly spinal manipulation and mobilization, appears to offer more sustained relief with fewer adverse effects than conventional drug treatments. As such, manual therapy should be considered a viable first-line treatment for sciatica, especially for patients who prefer non-pharmacological approaches. Further research is needed to determine the optimal combination of treatments for different patient populations.

    References

    • Arden, N. K., Price, C., Reading, I., Stubbing, J., Hazelgrove, J., & Rees, J. (2005). A multicenter randomized controlled trial of epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica: The WEST study. Rheumatology, 44(11), 1399-1406.
    • Cleland, J. A., Childs, J. D., Fritz, J. M., Whitman, J. M., Eberhart, S. L., & Palmer, J. A. (2009). Manual physical therapy and exercise versus electrophysical agents for the management of patients with acute low back pain: A randomized clinical trial. Manual Therapy, 14(4), 377-385.
    • Deyo, R. A., Von Korff, M., & Duhrkoop, D. (2015). Opioids for low back pain. BMJ, 350, g6380.
    • Friedman, B. W., Dymond, A., Davitt, M., Holden, L., Solorzano, C., Esses, D., & Bijur, P. E. (2015). Naproxen with cyclobenzaprine, or oxycodone/acetaminophen for treating acute low back pain. JAMA, 314(15), 1572-1580.
    • Furlan, A. D., Imamura, M., Dryden, T., & Irvin, E. (2015). Massage for low-back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 9, CD001929.
    • Leininger, B., Bronfort, G., Evans, R., Reiter, T., & Nelson, B. (2011). Spinal manipulation or mobilization for sciatica: A systematic review. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 34(8), 526-532.
    • Lewis, R. A., Williams, N. H., Sutton, A. J., Burton, K., Din, N. U., & Rickett, A. (2015). Comparative clinical effectiveness of management strategies for sciatica: Systematic review and network meta-analyses. Spine, 40(10), 764-775.
    • Mannion, A. F., Denzler, R., Dvorak, J., & Grob, D. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of post-treatment exercise to prevent recurrence of back pain. Spine, 37(12), 1051-1061.
    • McMorland, G., Suter, E., Casha, S., du Plessis, S. J., & Hurlbert, R. J. (2010). Manipulation or microdiscectomy for sciatica? A prospective randomized clinical study. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 33(8), 576-584.
    • Roelofs, P. D., Deyo, R. A., Koes, B. W., Scholten, R. J., & van Tulder, M. W. (2008). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: An updated Cochrane review. Spine, 33(16), 1766-1774.
    • van Tulder, M. W., Touray, T., Furlan, A. D., Solway, S., & Bouter, L. M. (2000). Muscle relaxants for non-specific low-back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, CD001252.

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Quick Links:

    Case History
    Physical Exam
    Treatment
    Articles
    Red Flags
    Yellow Flags
    Ortho Tests
    DMR's (UL)
    DMR's (LL)
    Cranial Nerves
    Questionnaires

    About painworx UK

    Welcome to Painworx UK, your trusted source for peer-reviewed information in the field of musculoskeletal health. Based in the United Kingdom, we are dedicated to empowering practitioners and students with the knowledge and tools they need to stay at the forefront of evidence-based practice.

    Copyright © 2024 PAINWORX UK