Physical Exam

A comprehensive physical examination in musculoskeletal practice should systematically assess various components to arrive at an accurate diagnosis. Key aspects that should be covered during the physical examination include:

1. Patient History

Understanding the patient’s history is crucial as it helps direct the physical examination. This includes the onset, duration, and characteristics of the pain or discomfort. The patient’s previous injuries, surgeries, and general health status should also be considered. A thorough history enables clinicians to identify potential risk factors or patterns associated with specific musculoskeletal conditions (Chou et al., 2011).

2. Inspection

A visual inspection should be performed to look for abnormalities such as swelling, discoloration, atrophy, or deformities. Observing the patient’s posture and gait can provide important clues about potential underlying conditions (Magee, 2014).

3. Palpation

Palpation is a hands-on technique used to assess soft tissue tenderness, muscle tone, and bony landmarks. This can help in identifying areas of inflammation, tenderness, or structural misalignment (Huijbregts & Vidal, 2017).

4. Range of Motion (ROM)

Active and passive ROM tests assess the flexibility and mobility of the affected joints. Limitations or pain during these movements can help narrow down the differential diagnosis. ROM assessment is an essential part of understanding the extent of joint involvement (Bialosky et al., 2018).

5. Neurological Examination

A neurological examination assesses nerve function, which includes reflexes, muscle strength, and sensory testing. This is particularly important when dealing with conditions like radiculopathy or peripheral nerve entrapments (Haig et al., 2005).

(Click below to read more)

6. Special Tests

Special orthopedic tests are performed to confirm or rule out specific diagnoses. For example, the Lachman test for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) integrity or the Spurling test for cervical radiculopathy. These tests are essential for narrowing down potential diagnoses based on clinical suspicion (Cook & Hegedus, 2013).

(Click below to read more)

7. Functional Assessment

Evaluating the patient’s functional capacity, including their ability to perform daily activities, can provide insight into how the musculoskeletal condition affects their quality of life. Tools such as the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) or the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) questionnaire can be useful in this regard (Fritz & Irrgang, 2001).

8. Gait Analysis

Gait analysis is essential in identifying abnormalities in walking patterns that may indicate structural or neurological issues. A detailed gait evaluation includes the observation of cadence, step length, and symmetry (Perry & Burnfield, 2010).

9. Diagnostic Imaging (if necessary)

Although not part of the physical exam itself, imaging techniques such as X-rays, MRIs, or CT scans can be used to further confirm findings from the physical exam (Ostelo et al., 2008). However, clinical guidelines suggest that imaging should be used judiciously and based on clinical findings to avoid unnecessary exposure or over-reliance on imaging results (Deyo et al., 2015).

References

• Bialosky, J. E., Bishop, M. D., & Penza, C. W. (2018). Physical examination findings in patients with musculoskeletal pain: What do they tell us? Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 26(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2018.1424097
• Chou, R., Qaseem, A., Snow, V., Casey, D., Cross, J. T., Shekelle, P., & Owens, D. K. (2011). Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: A joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(7), 478-491.
• Cook, C. E., & Hegedus, E. J. (2013). Orthopedic Physical Examination Tests: An Evidence-Based Approach. Elsevier Health Sciences.
• Deyo, R. A., Mirza, S. K., & Martin, B. I. (2015). Back pain prevalence and visit rates: Estimates from U.S. national surveys, 2002. Spine, 31(23), 2724-2727.
• Fritz, J. M., & Irrgang, J. J. (2001). A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Physical Therapy, 81(2), 776-788.
• Haig, A. J., Geisser, M. E., & Wong, M. (2005). Musculoskeletal disorder and back pain prevalence and intervention in automotive industry. Occupational Health, 18(2), 101-115.
• Huijbregts, P. A., & Vidal, J. (2017). Palpation techniques: Surface anatomy for physical therapists. Elsevier Health Sciences.
• Magee, D. J. (2014). Orthopedic physical assessment. Elsevier Health Sciences.
• Ostelo, R. W., Deyo, R. A., Stratford, P., Waddell, G., Croft, P., & Von Korff, M. (2008). Interventions for low back pain: An updated systematic review. Spine, 33(8), 990-1003.
• Perry, J., & Burnfield, J. M. (2010). Gait analysis: Normal and pathological function. SLACK Incorporated.