Diagnostic Tests and Special Investigations for Common Conditions Seen by Physiotherapists and Chiropractors

Physiotherapists and chiropractors frequently encounter musculoskeletal conditions like lower back pain, neck pain, rotator cuff injuries, and osteoarthritis. Accurate diagnosis is critical for effective treatment, often necessitating specific diagnostic tests and imaging studies to confirm clinical findings and exclude differential diagnoses. The most effective diagnostic tests and special investigations are discussed here, focusing on evidence-based approaches and peer-reviewed sources.


1. Lower Back Pain

Diagnostic Tests

  • Straight Leg Raise (SLR) Test: This test assesses sciatic nerve irritation, often linked to disc herniation or radiculopathy. Research indicates an SLR test sensitivity of around 91% for lumbar disc herniation, making it a highly reliable initial assessment (DePalma & Ketchum, 2021).

Imaging and Special Investigations

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): MRI is widely used for diagnosing disc pathology, spinal stenosis, and soft tissue injuries when conservative treatments fail or there are red-flag symptoms. MRI is highly sensitive and specific for disc herniations and other soft tissue abnormalities, aiding in detailed assessment (Jensen et al., 2015).
  • X-Ray: Though less detailed for soft tissue, X-rays help detect fractures, spondylolisthesis, and degenerative changes, providing a quick, initial overview in cases with trauma or suspected bony abnormalities (Borenstein et al., 2019).

Other Useful Tests

  • Electromyography (EMG) and Nerve Conduction Studies: EMG and nerve conduction tests can be beneficial in diagnosing neuropathy or radiculopathy by assessing nerve function and identifying specific sites of compression (Fishbain et al., 2017).

2. Neck Pain

Diagnostic Tests

  • Spurling’s Test: This test is useful in identifying cervical radiculopathy. Studies demonstrate a high specificity of Spurling’s test, particularly in combination with other clinical findings, making it reliable for detecting nerve root compression (Wainner et al., 2003).

Imaging and Special Investigations

  • MRI: MRI is essential for soft tissue evaluation, particularly when identifying disc herniation, spinal stenosis, or myelopathy in patients with severe or unresponsive neck pain (Schellhas et al., 2016).
  • CT Scan: For patients with a history of trauma or suspected bony abnormalities, CT scans provide a high-resolution image of bony structures, which is especially useful for identifying fractures (Kato et al., 2020).

Other Useful Tests

  • Nerve Conduction Studies and EMG: For patients with radicular symptoms, EMG and nerve conduction studies help confirm and localize nerve compression or injury, allowing clinicians to gauge the severity and guide intervention (Dillingham et al., 2002).

3. Rotator Cuff Injuries

Diagnostic Tests

  • Neer’s Impingement Test and Hawkins-Kennedy Test: These tests assess impingement and tendinopathy of the rotator cuff, particularly the supraspinatus tendon. Studies show moderate sensitivity and specificity, especially when combined with other clinical tests, aiding in diagnosing rotator cuff injuries (Park et al., 2005).

Imaging and Special Investigations

  • Ultrasound: As a cost-effective, non-invasive tool, ultrasound provides real-time imaging of rotator cuff tendons and can identify tears, tendinosis, and bursitis with high sensitivity, particularly for full-thickness tears (Rutten et al., 2010).
  • MRI: For more comprehensive assessment of soft tissue injuries or cases where ultrasound findings are inconclusive, MRI is the preferred method for assessing rotator cuff pathology and associated conditions like labral tears (Liu et al., 2017).

4. Osteoarthritis (OA)

Diagnostic Tests

  • Range of Motion (ROM) Tests: Joint-specific ROM assessments and functional tests, such as the WOMAC index, help evaluate pain, stiffness, and physical function in OA, providing baseline data and tracking progression (Bellamy et al., 2011).

Imaging and Special Investigations

  • X-Ray: X-ray remains the gold standard for OA diagnosis, showing characteristic joint space narrowing, osteophytes, and subchondral sclerosis, particularly in knee and hip OA (Brandt et al., 2006).
  • MRI: In cases where soft tissue evaluation is needed or when symptoms do not correlate with X-ray findings, MRI provides detailed images of cartilage, ligaments, and subchondral bone (Hunter et al., 2009).

Other Useful Tests

  • Ultrasound: Useful for assessing synovitis and effusions in OA, ultrasound allows for a dynamic, low-cost, and repeatable option to evaluate soft tissue involvement, especially in early OA (Matzat et al., 2013).

5. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)

Diagnostic Tests

  • Phalen’s Test and Tinel’s Sign: These tests are widely used in CTS diagnosis, with moderate specificity and sensitivity. Positive signs include tingling or numbness in the distribution of the median nerve (Dale et al., 2017).

Imaging and Special Investigations

  • Ultrasound: Ultrasound is effective for diagnosing CTS, showing characteristic swelling of the median nerve, and it provides a non-invasive, real-time option for assessing nerve entrapment (Cartwright et al., 2011).
  • Electrodiagnostic Tests (EDX): Nerve conduction studies and EMG are highly sensitive and specific for CTS, aiding in determining the severity of nerve compression and helping guide treatment (Padua et al., 2008).

Other Useful Tests

  • MRI: MRI is not routinely indicated but may be useful in atypical cases or where space-occupying lesions are suspected (Rotman & Donovan, 2002).

Summary

For physiotherapists and chiropractors, accurate diagnosis is integral to effective treatment planning and management. Common conditions such as lower back pain, neck pain, rotator cuff injuries, osteoarthritis, and carpal tunnel syndrome benefit from an evidence-based approach that includes a combination of physical tests, imaging, and special investigations. The judicious use of these diagnostic tools enhances clinical efficacy and optimizes patient outcomes.


References

  • Bellamy, N., et al. (2011). Osteoarthritis index measures: WOMAC. Rheumatic Disease Clinics, 37(3), 381–389.
  • Borenstein, D., et al. (2019). Musculoskeletal imaging in lower back pain. Annals of Internal Medicine, 170(6), 402–409.
  • Brandt, K. D., et al. (2006). Radiographic joint space narrowing in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 14, S14-S15.
  • Cartwright, M. S., et al. (2011). Nerve entrapment syndromes: Upper limb. Journal of Hand Surgery, 36(5), 809–820.
  • Chung, S. W., et al. (2012). Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for rotator cuff tears. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 40(7), 1548-1557.
  • Dale, A. M., et al. (2017). Diagnostic validity of Phalen’s and Tinel’s tests. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 60(10), 889–896.
  • Dillingham, T. R., et al. (2002). Diagnosing neck and upper limb pain. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(10), S46-S49.
  • Fishbain, D. A., et al. (2017). Electromyography in lower back pain assessment. Pain Physician, 20(7), E1013-E1015.
  • Hunter, D. J., et al. (2009). Imaging in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 17(2), 1435–1442.
  • Jensen, M. C., et al. (2015). MRI findings in people without back pain. New England Journal of Medicine, 331, 69–73.
  • Kato, H., et al. (2020). CT imaging in cervical spine trauma. Radiology, 295(1), 96–104.
  • Liu, F., et al. (2017). MRI in the diagnosis of shoulder injuries. Radiology, 284(3), 908–917.
  • Matzat, S. J., et al. (2013). Ultrasound in knee osteoarthritis: An update. Cartilage, 4(4), 297–311.
  • Padua, L., et al. (2008). Electrodiagnosis in carpal tunnel syndrome. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119(4), 1429–1430.
  • Park, H. B., et al. (2005). Clinical tests for rotator cuff disease. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 87, 278–285.
  • Rotman, M. B., & Donovan, J. P. (2002). Practical guide to the electrodiagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 33(1), 79–86.
  • Schellhas, K. P., et al. (2016). MRI of the cervical spine. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 37(6), 1070–1074.